Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the fluentformpro domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/curissolution/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131
Negligence – Recklessness – Recreational use statute – Curis Solution

Negligence – Recklessness – Recreational use statute

[ad_1]

Where a plaintiff was injured while attending an art reception at the defendant Lynn Museum & Historical Society, the conduct alleged does not rise to the level of recklessness, so the complaint must be dismissed.

“… As Plaintiff was walking up three concrete stairs to enter the building, she reached for the stair railing with her left hand. The railing was not secured at the bottom and came loose from the concrete, causing Plaintiff to fall backwards and fracture her wrist. …

“… As a preliminary matter, the parties agree that Plaintiff is barred from proceeding on a claim of negligence by the Recreational Use Statute, G.L.c. 21 §17C.

“… Here, even accepting all the factual allegations of the Second Amended Complaint as true, and drawing all reasonable inferences in the Plaintiffs’ favor, the conduct alleged does not rise to the level of recklessness and thus the Motion to Dismiss must be allowed.”

Day v. Lynn Historical Society, Inc., et al. (Lawyers Weekly No. 12-038-24) (4 pages) (Rooney, J.) (Middlesex Superior Court) (Civil Action No. 2381CV03094) (Aug. 20, 2024).

Click here to read the full text of the opinion.


[ad_2]

Source link

Scroll to Top

Notice: ob_end_flush(): Failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/curissolution/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5481